Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
The cost of motor cover could be set to fall by around £50 on average, actuaries have estimated, after a change to a key rate in England and Wales which helps to set injury compensation payouts.
When victims of life-changing injuries accept lump sum compensation, the rate is applied when calculating the payout.
The personal injury discount rate (PIDR) is used to help calculate how much defendants have to pay in damages to claimants and takes into account the potential returns that victims could expect to receive from their money over time from investing the cash.
This change is good news for drivers as it will further intensify the competitiveness of the motor insurance market
Mohammad Khan, PwC
From January 11 2025 a new discount rate of 0.5% will come into force, following improvements to the investments landscape, after a previous rate of minus 0.25%.
The move to a positive discount rate could help to ease some cost pressures on insurers, such as those providing motor cover, although rising cost pressures such as labour and raw materials remain.
Actuaries from PwC have estimated that premiums could decrease by an average of £50, with the rate change helping to intensify competition in the motor insurance market.
Mohammad Khan, head of general insurance, PwC UK, said: “This change is good news for drivers as it will further intensify the competitiveness of the motor insurance market.
“Motor insurance premiums have risen by over 20% over the last two years but the direction of travel has been turning and these amounts are starting to reduce.”
The PIDR in England and Wales is reviewed every five years.
The move to a positive rate reflects the improved investment market conditions since the rate was last set five years ago
Association of British Insurers spokesman
A spokesman for the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said the change is welcome, adding: “The move to a positive rate reflects the improved investment market conditions since the rate was last set five years ago.
“We and our members firmly believe in full and fair compensation for claimants.
“However, the Lord Chancellor’s approach embeds significant caution into the calculation which could lead to over-compensation. This could have an adverse impact on all premium-paying customers, particularly young drivers for whom costs are typically higher, and the taxpayer.”
An index from the ABI recently found the average motor insurance premium was £612 between July and September, which was 2% lower than in April to June but 9%, or around £50, higher than in the third quarter of 2023.
The typical cost of motor cover fell by around £10 in the third quarter of this year compared with the previous three months. It marked the second quarterly fall in a row.
I have paid careful regard to the need to avoid significant under-compensation for claimants, while simultaneously aiming to minimise excessive over-compensation
Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood
In a statement placed in the libraries of the Houses of Parliament, Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood said: “I have paid careful regard to the need to avoid significant under-compensation for claimants, while simultaneously aiming to minimise excessive over-compensation.
“Achieving the appropriate balance between these aims across all claimants is an extremely complex and difficult exercise, and one in which the expert analyses of the consultees to the review have been invaluable.
“It is very important to recognise that the personal injury discount rate will always be a relatively blunt instrument, since no one choice of rate can ever ensure that all claimants receive exactly their full compensation.
“When setting this rate, it is inevitable that some degree of over- or under-compensation of claimants will occur in individual cases.”
